<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trials &#8211; Personal Injury Lawyers in Raleigh &amp; Durham | Owens &amp; Miller</title>
	<atom:link href="https://owensmiller.com/tag/trials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://owensmiller.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Admissibility of Accident Reports in Jury Trials</title>
		<link>https://owensmiller.com/2013/03/admissibility-of-accident-reports-in-jury-trials/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[owensandmiller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admissibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owensandmiller.wordpress.com/?p=95</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In an opinion (Joines v. Moffitt) issued this morning by the NC Court of Appeals, the Court set forth an interesting discusssion of the admissibility of accident/crash reports in jury trials involving auto accidents. The complete opinion can be found at: http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/. The pertinent portion is quoted below: &#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;Hearsay is “a statement, other than one [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an opinion (Joines v. Moffitt) issued this morning by the NC Court of Appeals, the Court set forth an interesting discusssion of the admissibility of accident/crash reports in jury trials involving auto accidents.  </p>
<p>The complete opinion can be found at:<br />
http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/.  The pertinent portion is quoted below:<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;Hearsay is “a statement, other than one made by the<br />
declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in<br />
evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” N.C. R.<br />
Evid. 801(c). Although hearsay is generally inadmissible,<br />
records of regularly conducted business activities are<br />
admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule under Rule 803 of<br />
the North Carolina Rules of Evidence. N.C. R. Evid. 803(6).<br />
This Court has held that highway accident reports may be<br />
admitted under Rule 803(6) if properly authenticated. Wentz v.<br />
Unifi, Inc., 89 N.C. App. 33, 39, 365 S.E.2d 198, 201 (1988).<br />
Proper authentication requires a showing that the report was (1)<br />
“prepared at or near the time of the act(s) reported”; (2)<br />
prepared “by or from information transmitted by a person with<br />
knowledge of the act(s)”; and (3) “kept in the course of a<br />
regularly conducted business activity, with such being a regular<br />
practice of that business activity.” Id. If a document meets<br />
these criteria, it is admissible unless the circumstances<br />
surrounding the preparation of the report “indicate a lack of<br />
trustworthiness.” N.C. R. Evid. 803(6).&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
